Pollution in Austin, TX, United States
Air pollution data from World Health Organization  | |
|---|---|
| PM10 | 17 |
| PM2.5 | 9 |
| PM10 Pollution Level: | Low |
Pollution in Austin, TX, United States
| Air Pollution | 31.37 | Low | |
| Drinking Water Pollution and Inaccessibility | 25.26 | Low | |
| Dissatisfaction with Garbage Disposal | 22.34 | Low | |
| Dirty and Untidy | 32.92 | Low | |
| Noise and Light Pollution | 54.04 | Moderate | |
| Water Pollution | 44.07 | Moderate | |
| Dissatisfaction to Spend Time in the City | 19.90 | Very Low | |
| Dissatisfaction with Green and Parks in the City | 19.95 | Very Low |
Purity and Cleanliness in Austin, TX, United States
| Air quality | 68.63 | High | |
| Drinking Water Quality and Accessibility | 74.74 | High | |
| Garbage Disposal Satisfaction | 77.66 | High | |
| Clean and Tidy | 67.08 | High | |
| Quiet and No Problem with Night Lights | 45.96 | Moderate | |
| Water Quality | 55.93 | Moderate | |
| Comfortable to Spend Time in the City | 80.10 | Very High | |
| Quality of Green and Parks | 80.05 | Very High |
Contributors: 107
Last update: January 2021
These data are based on perceptions of visitors of this website in the past 3 years.
If the value is 0, it means it is perceived as very low, and if the value is 100, it means it is perceived as very high.
Moving to Austin, TX? Explore:
Nearby cities:| Pollution in San Antonio, Texas | 79.89 miles |
| Pollution in Waco, Texas | 101.85 miles |
| Pollution in Kerrville, Texas | 102.67 miles |
| Pollution in College Station, Texas | 106.60 miles |
| Pollution in Houston, Texas | 163.29 miles |
| Pollution in Fort Worth, Texas | 187.07 miles |
| Pollution in Dallas, Texas | 198.85 miles |
| Pollution in San Angelo, Texas | 205.75 miles |
| Pollution in Garland, Texas | 214.18 miles |
| Pollution in Plano, Texas | 214.48 miles |
This page in other languages:
DeutschUmweltverschmutzung in Austin
PortuguêsPoluição em Austin
ItalianoInquinamento a Austin
FrançaisPollution à Austin
EspañolContaminación en Austin
If Governments and their environmental agencies research will discover that is possible to decrease up to 60% of the emission of pollution that the industrial process generates when using fired-coal and/or iron ore.
So I hope that a contact will be made with TCS Ltda, which holds a new technology that allows this fact.
This TCS technology is already being implemented in the Brazilian mining company Vale S.A, in Vitoria / ES - Brasil.
Industries that use coal in their industrial process, use the equipment ESP to filter and retain the particulate material that is generated.
Unretained material is released into the atmosphere through the Chimneys.
This new technology allows the ESP can be operated at a much higher voltage, allowing the capture of 100% of particles with equivalent diameter between PM 0.1 and PM 2.5 micron and, of course, also the largest.
There is a real possibility that all particles smaller than PM 0.1 will be retained, within 2/3 years, when some developing electrical components are available.
It would be of great value, if the large companies that use iron ore and / or coal in their industrial processes sent a technician, who knows ESP-Electrostatic Precipitators, to our office in Brazil, to know "in loco" how this new Technology eliminates the atmospheric pollution generated by the burning of coal or/and iron ore.
Regards.
Engº Flavio Berthoud
TCS Ltda
CEO
PS: WhatsApp:55 27 99982 0767